Prohibition was established to correct social issues in the 1920s, but it unexpectedly backfired on Canada.The constitutional ban on alcohol drastically increased crime rates in Canada.It also unexpectedly created several social issues, when prohibition was put into effect to eliminate them.In addition to this, it evidently had a negative impact on Canada’s overall economy. Prohibition was ineffective in 1920s because of the negative effects that includes increased criminal activity, social issues, and the harm to the economy.To begin with, Prohibition increased criminal activity in Canada, from the rum-runners, bootleggers, and the speakeasies, which made it ineffective in the 1920s.During the Prohibition era, many people obtained their alcohol from rum-runners who were people that illegally smuggled alcohol in from other countries.As exemplified, rum-runners significantly increased the number of criminal acts in Canada since they solely did crimes like smuggling alcohol into the country, which was strictly prohibited. Prohibition was put in movement in Canada to confine the sale and transportation of alcohol such as beer, wines, and spirits. As rum-runners became more prominent in the 1920s, the rates of criminal activity were increased as a result since these individuals and groups were often associated with violence and illegal sale with the public. This made Prohibition ineffective in the 1920s, as the government’s intention was to eradicate crime in the country, however it unexpectedly increased as rum-runners became more distinguished for consistently committing the crime of smuggling alcohol for the benefit of the public. During the 1920s in Canada, the public illegally obtained alcohol from bootleggers who manufactured and sold their own alcohol.Undoubtedly, bootleggers increased criminal activity during the Prohibition era in Canada since they illegally produced alcohol, which was an offense against the law. They used unused warehouses and factories that were abandoned as a result of the government’s ban of alcohol production, without the government’s consent, to continue making alcohol and unlawfully distribute it to the public. Bootleggers became more prominent during the 1920s, after the Prohibition law was passed, which exemplifies the law’s ineffectiveness because it added to the criminal acts happening in Canada. As the sale of alcohol to the public was outlawed during the Prohibition era, the drinking secretly went underground to private locations called speakeasies, which were unlawful drinking places that were very popular because they sold alcohol privately as a beverage, which was clearly deemed illegal.In addition to the rum-runners and bootleggers, the speakeasies that were unlawfully created to illegally sell alcohol is exemplification that there was an increase in criminal activity in Canada during the Prohibition era. Despite the Prohibition law that stated that the sale of alcohol and liquor was illegal, speakeasies regardlessly obtained liquor and continued the sale of alcohol to the public. Since the number of criminal acts increased after Prohibition caused the illicit creation of speakeasies, Prohibition was ineffective in the 1920s as it did the opposite of reducing illegal actions and crime.In addition, the Prohibition law created social issues, including a public demand for alcohol, an increased alcohol consumption, and job losses, which demonstrates its ineffectiveness.When prohibition began, people immediately wanted a way to drink, so it increased the public demand for alcohol underground. After the Prohibition law came about, the sudden increase of public demand of alcohol ultimately lead to the benefit of the speakeasies and the bootleggers. The law was created to essentially decrease the demand for alcohol, but it unexpectedly did the opposite as the high demand for alcohol created the illegal transportation and selling of liquor, which evidently became a social issue as it caused several deaths and created illegal networks. Since Prohibition failed to reduce alcohol demand, it was unsuccessful in 1920s.Prohibition surprisingly brought an increase in alcohol consumption, as people went to speakeasies with the purpose of getting intoxicated, so when they did get the chance, they would drink to a great extent. Clearly, Prohibition caused the social issue of the increased alcohol consumption in the public. It became an issue that influenced a considerable number of the people within Canada, as it completely changed their behaviors. Prohibition played a major role in the morals and behaviors of the public in the 1920s since the pattern of drinking changed drastically during Prohibition. Majority of the drinking problems became worse than they have ever been. In simple terms, alcohol consumption turned into a major social issue, which justifies Prohibition’s ineffectiveness.As a result of Prohibition, hundreds of people in the alcohol business lost their jobs and had to either find a lower-paying work or become criminals, and it was nearly impossible to find jobs since breweries, distilleries and saloons were shut down.Unfortunately, after Prohibition was put into movement in the 1920s, people lost their jobs in the alcohol industry, which rapidly became a social issue in Canada. If they wanted to stay in the same profession, they had to break the law to support their families. Job loss in Canada was very minimal before the Prohibition era, but after it came about, this social issue initiated very quickly. This should have been foreseen by the government, but since it was overlooked, Prohibition became ineffective as it caused major job losses, to correct other problems that never got corrected.Furthermore, when the Prohibition law was put in movement, it harmed the economy as entertainment industries lost revenue, the government experienced tax loss, and the alcohol industry shut down, which made the law unsuccessful in the 1920s.Promptly after Prohibition was introduced, the entertainment industries experienced a loss of revenue, since movie theaters, nightlife spots, were at a major fund loss, and bars had to close down seeing that the business was considered illegal due to Prohibition.The entertainment industry was an important element to the alcohol industry in Canada. Most places of entertainment suddenly lost income, which was not expected. Not only did Prohibition harm the entertainment industry, but it also harmed the declining alcohol industry. Primarily, it ruined Canada’s economy, which made the government’s Prohibition ineffective.Before Prohibition, Canada depended on alcohol taxes for the economy, and with Prohibition, the revenue in taxes declined as alcohol could not be taxed by the government, which made it more of a struggle to obtain tax income. Noticeably, the government lost a great deal of revenue in taxes as a consequence of Prohibition regulation against the alcohol industry. Alcohol sales were seemingly going underground to speakeasies, during the time when the government needed the money during the Great Depression. The federal government would have collected the anticipated amount of income tax, and there would not have been any harm to the economy if Prohibition never occurred. Prohibition’s ineffectiveness is apparent as there was a downfall to Canada’s own economy while it was not the intention. After Prohibition, Canada’s economy recognized large losses from alcohol sales since the various alcohol producing companies that consisted of large factories, would have acquired millions of dollars in alcohol sales per year, however considering that alcohol sales were restricted, these large companies closed down, halting the revenue through alcohol sales. The government did not predict how Prohibition would cause harm to the economy. The alcohol industry has always been a prominent industry in the Canada, and Prohibition caused the establishments that purely sold alcohol to shut down which not only created a complete loss in revenue, but it ceased this industry. For that reason, harmed Canada’s economy. Considering what occurred, it is apparent that Prohibition’s ineffectiveness was accountable for the economy’s downfall.All things considered, Prohibition should have been repealed in Canada.The negative effects which includes increased criminal activity, social issues, and harm to the economy, made Prohibition ineffective in 1920s.Moreover, Prohibition increased criminal activity in Canada, from the rum-runners, bootleggers, and the speakeasies.It also created social issues, including a public demand for alcohol, an increased alcohol consumption, and job losses. Not to mention it harmed the economy as entertainment industries lost revenue, the government experienced tax loss, and the valuable alcohol industry shut down.In any event, would an effective law cause the government to encounter more complications?