Name

Name: Lau Jin Mei
Student ID: 19856471
Date: 13 September 2018
Practical: Biochemistry Of Amylase
Subject: Biology of Cell & Organism (BIO1CO)
Demonstrator: Dr Martin Grunert
ABSTRACT
This laboratory experiment investigated how salivary amylase enzyme activity on the structure of different polysaccharides affect the concentrations of reducing sugar. The experiment was conducted using starch, glycogen and cellulose solutions and reacted with diluted saliva and water in duplicated sets. The tubes were left for 30 minutes for reaction to take place and 3,5 di-nitrosalicylic acid (DNS) solution was added to each tube before heating for 5 minutes. It was hypothesized that cellulose has no reducing sugar while starch and glycogen have reducing sugar. Base on the results, there are reddish brown colour present in starch and glycogen solutions except for cellulose solution. Salivary amylase can hydrolyse the alpha bonds of polysaccharides but not beta bonds of cellulose. INTRODUCTION
Enzymes are highly specific in their action, they work only on the substrate with 3-D shape complementary to its active site. Chemical reaction takes place once the substrate is attached to active site and is converted to products (Lam, P. K., & Lam, E. Y., 2013). Saliva secreted by the salivary glands contains enzymes such as amylase, lysosome and lingual lipase (Becker, A, 2018). Amylase are found in two forms, alpha (?) – amylase and beta (?) – amylase. Alpha amylase is produced in the salivary glands and pancreas. It is an enzyme that hydrolyses ?-1,4-glucosidic bonds of polysaccharides to get glucose and maltose (“Vazhacharickal, P. J.”). Starch comprises of amylose which is a linear chain of D-glucose units joined by ?-1,4-glucosidic bonds and amylopectin are made of glucose units linked occasionally with ?-1,6-glucosidic bonds (Libretexts, 2016). Glycogen has similar structure as amylopectin but is more highly branched and has shorter chain (Libretexts, 2016). For cellulose, the glucose units are joined by ?-1,4-glycosidic linkages and is more extended than amylose (Libretexts, 2016). After enzyme reaction, 3,5 di-nitrosalicylic acid (DNS) solution is used for testing of reducing sugar due to presence of carboxyl group. Under alkaline conditions, DNS solution reacts with reducing sugar to form 3-amino-5-nitrosalicylic acid which turns reddish brown color (“Estimation of Reducing Sugars by DNSA method”). The aim of this experiment was to study how salivary amylase enzyme activity on the structure of different polysaccharides affect the concentrations of reducing sugar. It was hypothesized that cellulose has no reducing sugar while starch and glycogen have reducing sugar.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
1.0 ml of saliva was collected by spitting into a clean centrifuge tube and was diluted with 9.0 ml of water. 0.5 ml of glycogen, starch, cellulose and maltose solutions were pipetted into each of the 2.0 ml centrifuge test tube vials and repeated for another set. The polysaccharide solutions have been buffered to pH 6.8 to allow salivary enzymes to work. The first set of test tube vials was added with 0.5 ml of diluted saliva and second set with 0.5 ml of water. The samples were mixed thoroughly and allowed to stand for at least 30 minutes with occasional shaking for hydrolysis of polysaccharides. After 30 minutes, 1.0 ml of 3.5 di-nitrosalicylic acid (DNS) solution was added to each test tube vials and heated up in the digital dry bath for 5 minutes to stop enzyme reaction. The samples were removed after 5 minutes and changes were taken note.
RESULTS
49987201192530Cellulose + Saliva
Cellulose + Saliva
381001198245Glycogen + Saliva
00Glycogen + Saliva
17830801189990Maltose + Saliva
Maltose + Saliva
34975801189990Starch + Saliva
Starch + Saliva
Fig 1.1 Colour change of polysaccharides with diluted saliva after boiling for 5 minutes
left1370330Glycogen + Water
00Glycogen + Water
33832801383030Starch + Water
00Starch + Water
15925801390650Maltose + Water
00Maltose + Water
49225201390650Cellulose + Water
00Cellulose + Water

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Fig 1.2 Colour change of polysaccharides with water after boiling for 5 minutes
DISCUSSION
Maltose is a negative control for the experiment to confirm that DNS indicator solution together with simple sugars produce reddish brown colour which is a strong positive result. This also ensures that they were no other variables present to give a false positive result. Duplicated tubes with polysaccharides with water was to check if any there is any breakdown of polysaccharides in the absence of salivary amylase. From Figure 1.1 and 1.2, the maltose produces a red colour after boiling when treated only with water and in diluted saliva. This implies that maltose has many reducing ends and the salivary amylase enzyme can hydrolyse the ?-1,4-glucosidic bonds of maltose. During hydrolysis of starch, enzyme amylase breaks bond to form maltose and further bond breaking by maltase releases individual glucose molecules (Lam, P. K., & Lam, E. Y., 2013). As glycogen is more highly branched and has shorter chain, it hydrolyses to glucose faster than starch. The alpha bonds of starch and glycogen are hydrolyzed by salivary amylase enzyme to form reducing sugar, giving rise to reddish brown colour as seen in figure 1.1. From figure 1.1, there is no colour change for cellulose. Human alpha amylase is unable to break down ?-1,4-glycosidic linkages of cellulose so it will be undigested. Undigested cellulose are fibers to help smooth working of intestine tract (“Carbohydrates – Cellulose”). Only herbivores like cows have symbiotic bacteria to produce cellulase that breaks down cellulose into monosaccharides (Cellulase, 2018). Source of error can be the diluted saliva were added to the polysaccharides at different timings, so the time taken for each enzyme reaction will be inconsistent. Therefore, diluted saliva should be added at the same time or start the timer once the polysaccharide solution is added with diluted saliva. We can only observe the colour change to determine whether there is reducing sugar present. Therefore, one potential way to improve the experiment is to use the spectrometer to measure the absorbance to determine the concentration of reducing sugar for each polysaccharide.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, our salivary amylase enzyme is only capable of breaking alpha bonds. DNS indicator solution changes to reddish brown colour after starch, glycogen and maltose are hydrolysed to reducing sugars.

ACKNOWLEGEMENTS
I would like to thank my laboratory partner, Miren for doing the experiment with me, Laboratory Technician, Melvin for setting up the experiments and Dr Martin and Ms Kate for the demonstration.

REFERENCES
Lam, P. K., & Lam, E. Y. (2013). Biology matters. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish Education.

Becker, A. (2018, March 13). Names of the Enzymes in the Mouth & Esophagus. Retrieved from https://sciencing.com/names-enzymes-mouth-esophagus-17242.htmlVazhacharickal, P. J. (n.d.). GRIN – Behaviour of Salivary Amylase in Various Reaction Environments with Reference to Km and Vmax. An Overview. Retrieved from https://www.grin.com/document/367145
Libretexts. (2016, October 14). 14.7: Polysaccharides. Retrieved from https://chem.libretexts.org/Under_Construction/Textmaps_and_Wikitexts/MVC:_Chem_1406/Chapters/14:_Carbohydrates/14.7:_Polysaccharides
Estimation of Reducing Sugars by DNSA method. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://orbitbiotech.com/estimation-of-reducing-sugars-by-dnsa-method/
Carbohydrates – Cellulose. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://chemistry.elmhurst.edu/vchembook/547cellulose.html
Cellulase. (2018, August 04). Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cellulase
APPENDIX
49517301252855Cellulose + Saliva
Cellulose + Saliva
16154401259205Maltose + Saliva
00Maltose + Saliva
901701264285Glucose + Saliva
Glucose + Saliva
34328101246505Starch + Saliva
Starch + Saliva

Fig 2.1 Diluted saliva with polysaccharides solution 49466501320800Cellulose + Water
00Cellulose + Water
34290001308100Starch + Water
00Starch + Water
17335501327150Maltose + Water
00Maltose + Water
1714501339850Glucose + Water
00Glucose + Water

Fig 2.2 Water with polysaccharides solution
49530001238250Cellulose + Saliva
Cellulose + Saliva
1143001262380Glucose + Saliva
00Glucose + Saliva
17068801264920Maltose+ Saliva
00Maltose+ Saliva
34290001250950Starch + Saliva
Starch + Saliva

Fig 3.1 DNS solution was added to the polysaccharides solution with diluted saliva
1714501398905Glucose + Water
00Glucose + Water
17272001386205Maltose + Water
00Maltose + Water
32702501398905Starch + Water
00Starch + Water
48577501405255Cellulose + Water
00Cellulose + Water

Fig 3.2 DNS solution was added to the polysaccharides solution with water

Name

Name:
Course:
Instructor:
Date:
Inside Job Documentary
Directed by Charles Ferguson, “Inside Job” details the causes and results of the financial meltdown of 2008. The documentary, a sleek Wall Street film, whose heading proposes a robbery film, details a criminality without retribution, a scandal that has mostly absconded the legal endorsement and societal disgrace (Ferguson 1). In addition, the documentary chronicles the duplicity of shared values and public trust by the same people who should have disallowed the financial crisis. The film chronicles the issues that surrounded the real estate bubble, the growing complexities within the financial sector, the eruption of the subprime lending, countless warnings on the impending financial crisis, and soaring of share indexes that marked the financial crisis. In this regards, the assessment of the documentary will reveal the main causes and consequences of the financial crisis.
As the documentary chronicles the happenings leading to the financial crisis, it provides a critical analysis on the causes of the financial crisis, and how even after the banking crash, the government and the private sector have done little to reform the sector or prosecute the main protagonists who partook in the crisis (Varon 21). The film provides a comprehensive framework on the people who caused the financial crisis, mostly politicians, bankers, academics, credit rating agencies, and regulators, all of whom played a significant role in the crisis. Advocates of deregulation and people who related well with the government took a greater role in the crisis, which maimed the banking sector of America. On the other hand, some academicians believe that the banks understood the financial climate, supported deregulation, and saw the financial crisis as an economic bubble that would wither with time.
Whether the bankers and politicians took large bundles of cash did not matter as long as the economy responded to the crisis positively. However, the film and other remarkable studies suggest that the relationship between the main causes of the financial crisis was a significant factor that led to the crisis and more so the long period the banking sector took to recover (Varon 19). In addition, to the politicians and bankers, the film stresses that Capitol Hill, regulators, Wall Street, and numerous academics played a critical role in the crisis. However, the film stresses that although societal stigma may play a role in blaming the players or forcing them to pay, legal sanctions may not play a role since the players utilized high levels of securitization and complex credit default swaps that only a non-partisan and a powerful body can offer judgment.
The financial meltdown wrecked billions of stockholders’ wealth, devastated a large number of pensioners, reduced millions of people unemployed, caused international crises of magnitudes unseen since the great depression, and wrecked the economy of America greatly(Fergusson, Beck, Bolt and Damon 12). However, the crises generated a comprehensive outlook on the state of affairs in the financial sector, which may generate a worse crisis in the future. The Wall Street CEOs acted as powerbrokers and lobbyists before and during the crisis, where they broke laws and collaborated with the government to generate the crisis. On the other hand, whistle blowers warned of an impending crisis, but they did not explain the causes or measures to control the crisis. In this regards, the film proffers an exact and abridged outlook of the securitization process of bank loans and mortgages that created the crisis.
“Inside Job” shows how the Wall Street geniuses used mathematical wizardly and glamorous products to cause the crisis for their own financial sake. In essence, Wall Street notions such as Structured Investment Vehicles, Credit Default Swaps, Collateralized Debt Obligations, and Market Markers appear as the vehicles used by the brokers, supine regulators, politicians, and bankers to rob the public. The culture of focusing on bonuses and quarterly reports within Wall Street, brokers’ undertakings of regulating derivative markets and OTC and use of hedge funds to rob the public appear as the mainstream principles used by the power brokers during the crisis. Interviews of Larry Summers and Alan Greenspan show how poor brokers in Wall Street used mathematical wizardly to benefit from deregulation and market derivative that drove the financial sector. In this regards, as shown throughout the film, Wall Street brokers, regulators, politicians, bankers, and government agencies used the existing loopholes in the sector to create a crises, which the same people used to coerce the government to bail out companies.
As most people would want to suggest that deregulation of the banking sector occurred during Bush’s era, the film provide a critical perspective on the period the American government deregulated the banking sector i.e. Bill Clinton’s period (Fergusson, Beck, Bolt and Damon 12). Interestingly, the film provides the issues that surrounded the bailouts of several companies by the government that had together with other players wrecked the companies. The government forced the companies to repay the loans with huge interests i.e. companies such as AIG, JP Morgan, and Goldman were forced by the government to take the bailouts, then forced to repay with punitive interests (Fergusson, Beck, Bolt and Damon 12). However, the film does not provide a scenario on the rampant corruption that occurred during the crisis, and only attempts to provide a whitewash criticism of the players to the crisis.
On the other hand, the film provided a framework analysis on the happenings that surrounded the financial crisis, but fails to consider other occurrences elsewhere or draw comparisons to global economics. In this regards, the film does not expose the whole fraud that occurred during the crisis and only attempts to show the main players during the crisis. As such, the film fails to discuss some of the issues that were critical to the crisis such as the role of the Federal Reserve in overseeing the banking sector, the cartel potential of the Federal Reserve, the investment portfolio of credit rating agencies, and the issues regarding negative interest rates for banks.
However, the film provides an analysis on the lobbyist aspect of bankers, how bankers own the economic profession, and the relationship between the government and banks (Fergusson, Beck, Bolt and Damon 12). In this regards, the film provide an analysis on the mainstream corruption that occurred during the financial crisis, although the criticism is just a tiny story of the whole happenings. On the other hand, the film base the chronicles on interviews, but unfortunately the interviewed such as Eliot Spitzer, Dominique Strauss Khan, and Glenn Hubbard do not come across as genuine sympathizers of the public. The film provide the link between the government and bankers through Larry Summers, but one cannot project a case against him since major complexities surround securitization and credit default swaps. In this regards, the film shows that although the players may be responsible for their crimes, more so in causing the crisis, the legal conviction remains a farfetched notion. In some instances, the movie vilifies individual traders who may not have played a role in the crisis such as Chuck Prince, president of Citigroup. Nevertheless, the film will make people distrust the banking industry, vilify the government, pray for more regulation in the banking industry.
Works Cited
Fergusson, C. J., C. Beck, A. Bolt, and M. Damon. “Inside job.” A documentary film about the late-2000s financial crisis directed by Charles Ferguson and co-written with Chad Beck (2010).Ferguson, Charles. Inside job. Dir. Charles Ferguson. Perf. Audrey Marrs, Charles Ferguson. Sony pictures home entertainment e?d., 2010. Blu-Ray.Varon, Jeremy. “It’s Good to Be King: The Crisis Documentary and the American Dreamscape: Heist: Who Stole the American Dream?, You’ve Been Trumped and The Queen of Versailles.” New Labor Forum. Vol. 23. No. 1. SAGE Publications, 2014.

x

Hi!
I'm Dianna!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out