In in the field of public education the doctrine

In U.S. supreme court cases evaluating questions of inequality and racism, the two stand out. In 1896, the U.S supreme court ruled in Plessy v. Ferguson law case that “separate but equal” facilities were constitutional. Brown v. Board of Education, Topeka case in 1954, the supreme court conclude that in the field of public education the doctrine of “separate but equal” has no place. Therefore, by evaluating racist legal language in court cases, it becomes clear racism and inequality were unpleasant in the 18th & 19th century. This is significant because a person of color was being deprived of their rights in public facilities.An evaluation of Plessy v. Ferguson court case shows that exclusionary language reinforces separate but equal doctrine that violates the constitutional law. There was only one court justice that disagreed with the ruling and he made the point that our constitution is color blind. For instance, according the supreme court justices, the majority opinion stated, “The object of the amendment was undoubtedly to enforce the absolute equality of the two races before the law, but in the nature of things it could not have been intended to abolish distinction based upon color, or to enforce social, as distinguished from political equality or commingling of the two races upon terms unsatisfactory to either,” (Plessy v. Ferguson., Pg. 543). ¬†This suggests inequality upon a person of color because legislatures placed the amendment negatively impacting how they are treated in the public facilities. Also the exclusionary language used expresses a person of color was deprived of their rights and equality. Another for example, stated, ” The power to assign to a particular coach obviously implies the power to determine to which race the passenger belongs, as well as the power to determine who, under the laws of the particular state, is to be deemed a white, and who a colored person…,”(Plessy v. Ferguson., Pg. 543). This suggest that the coach has the right to assign a seat based on color depending on particular states and it goes under their laws. It’s unfair to a person of color because they were being judged on their color just for a seat in the railroad trains. Plessy v. Ferguson court case was unequal and unfair because it got overruled by the majority of the supreme court.An evaluation of Brown v. Board of Education, Topeka court case presented that racist language reinforces the fourteenth amendment that violates the due process clause. The supreme court felt compelled to rule in favour of Board of Education as Plessy v. Ferguson precedent had not been overturned yet. For instance, Mr. Chief Justice Warren delivered the opinion of the court stated ¬†“To separate them from others of similar age and qualifications solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community that may affect their hearts or minds in a way unlikely ever to be undone,” (Brown v. Board of Education, Topeka.,Pg.551). The racist language used expresses a person of color has to fit the requirements to even go to school. This suggest that a person of color was weak and the whites were superior than a person of color because of a skin color, race, religion, gender or etc. making them feel like they’re not human. One thing for sure is that whites or any color are all humans which makes everyone equal. Another for example,according Mr. Chief Justice Warren majority of the court opinion stated, “In each instance, they had been denied admission to schools attended by white children under laws requiring or permitting segregation according to race,”(Brown v. Board of Education, Topeka.,Pg.550). This suggest that children were being discriminated because of their color and not caring about a person of color education. A person of color was trying hard to get admitted into the school attended by white children for a better education and a brighter future. To sum up, racist language in the court case of Brown v. Board of Education, Topeka violates the due process clause of the fourteenth amendmentTaking both U.S. Supreme Court cases, Plessy v. Ferguson and Brown v.Board of Education, Topeka are both racist and unequal to a person of color. But depriving a person of color the right in the United States is uncalled for because white also made the United states their home since immigrating in the 16 century. Every person in the United States has a right even if they are not citizens, we are all humans no matter what. Even the person’s race, religion, gender, or etc. it should not makes us different instead equal.

x

Hi!
I'm Dianna!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out